Semiotika Arsitektur sebagai Pendekatan dalam Memahami Simbol Budaya pada Bangunan Tradisional

Authors

  • Febriyanti Departemen Teknik Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan, Universitas Pohuwato Author

Keywords:

Architectural semiotics;, Traditional architecture;, Cultural symbol;, Inverted triangle;, Architectural preservation.

Abstract

Traditional architecture is a cultural representation that serves not only as shelter but also as a medium for conveying a society's values, identity, beliefs, and worldview. This study analyzes traditional architecture as a sign system, particularly to understand the symbolic meaning of downward-tapering triangular forms. The research employs a qualitative-descriptive approach using literature review and visual text analysis. Data were obtained from scientific articles, building documentation, architectural drawings, and previous studies discussing semiotics, traditional architecture, spatial planning, tectonics, ornamentation, and cultural preservation. The analysis was conducted by identifying the relationship between signifiers and signifieds, classifying signs as icons, indices, or symbols, and examining their denotative and connotative meanings. The results indicate that traditional architecture can be understood as a cultural communication system shaped through three main domains: the spatial domain, the structural and tectonic domain, and the ornamentation and decorative arts domain. Downward-tapering triangular forms may have technical, visual, and symbolic functions, but their meanings are not universal and must be interpreted based on the cultural context of their supporting community. The semiotic approach makes an important contribution to architectural preservation because it enables conservation to be carried out not only on physical forms but also on the accompanying meanings, local knowledge, traditional techniques, and social practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Fuentes Pardo, J. M. (2023). Challenges and current research trends for vernacular architecture in a global world: A literature review. Buildings, 13(1), Article 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010162

[2] Handoko, J. P. S. (2024). Semiotics analysis method in architectural research. Jurnal KORIDOR, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.32734/koridor.v15i2.14732

[3] Hasan, L. O. A., & Ikaputra. (2025). Tinjauan teoretis makna arsitektur melalui perspektif semiotika. Arsitektura: Jurnal Ilmiah Arsitektur dan Lingkungan Binaan, 23(1), 53–60. DOI: 10.20961/arst.v23i1.97622

[4] Hasan, L. O. A., & Ikaputra. (2025). Tinjauan teoretis makna arsitektur melalui perspektif semiotika. Arsitektura: Jurnal Ilmiah Arsitektur dan Lingkungan Binaan, 23(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.20961/arst.v23i1.97622

[5] Helmi, R. (2023). Analysis of functions and semiotic meanings of traditional Acehnese house ornaments. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 19(2), 140–149. DOI: 10.33633/lite.v19i2.9073

[6] Helmi, R. (2023). Analysis of functions and semiotic meanings of traditional Acehnese house ornaments. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 19(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v19i2.9073

[7] Hematang, Y. I. P., & Ikaputra. (2022). Four aspects of architectural tectonics through exploration of the meaning of tectonics with a systematic literature review method. Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism, 5(1), 1–11. DOI: 10.14710/jadu.v5i1.15470

[8] Kusumowardani, D. (2024). Etno-arsemiotika dalam “membaca” elemen pada arsitektur tradisional. Jurnal Desain Interior, 9(2), 163–172. DOI: 10.12962/j12345678.v9i2.20571

[9] Maknun, T., Hasjim, M., Muslimat, M., & Hasyim, M. (2020). The form of the traditional bamboo house in the Makassar culture: A cultural semiotic study. Semiotica, 2020(235), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0162

[10] Nardiati, S., Isnaeni, M., Widodo, S. T., Sumadi, Hardaniwati, M., Susilawati, D., Winarti, S., Suyami, Endardi, J., & Zalmansyah, A. (2023). Cultural and philosophical meaning of Javanese traditional houses: A case study in Yogyakarta and Surakarta, Indonesia. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 1–10. DOI: 10.32601/ejal.902001

[11] Nardiati, S., Isnaeni, M., Widodo, S. T., Sumadi, Hardaniwati, M., Susilawati, D., Winarti, S., Suyami, Endardi, J., & Zalmansyah, A. (2023). Cultural and philosophical meaning of Javanese traditional houses: A case study in Yogyakarta and Surakarta, Indonesia. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.902001

[12] Olukoya, O. A. P. (2021). Framing the values of vernacular architecture for a value-based conservation: A conceptual framework. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 4974. DOI: 10.3390/su13094974

[13] Putra, R. A., & Ekomadyo, A. S. (2023). Transformation of architecture of Rumoh Aceh: An encoding process through semiotic. Local Wisdom: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Kearifan Lokal, 15(1), 1–11. DOI: 10.26905/lw.v15i1.7632

[14] Rahmawati, A. L., Arifin, L. S., & Dwisusanto, Y. B. (2022). Mimesis-semiotics method as an alternative to dynamic vernacular heritage conservation: An application on the Karo traditional house in Dokan Cultural Village, Indonesia. ISVS e-Journal, 9(4), 110–127.

[15] Sahputra, Z., & Rahmi, M. (2023). Analysis of the architecture and meaning of the ornamental variety of the Aceh traditional house: A case study of an Aceh traditional house in Lambunot Village, Aceh Besar. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 22(1), 35–46. DOI: 10.5614/sostek.itbj.2023.22.1.3

[16] Sianipar, T., Silaba, I., Hutagalung, A., Pakpahan, H., & Sitorus, L. (2025). Fungsi dan makna simbolis atap Rumah Bolon etnik Batak Simalungun: Kajian semiotika. Jurnal Basataka, 8(2), 1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.36277/basataka.v8i2.1021

[17] Sunarti, S., & Ikaputra. (2021). Semiotika untuk memahami makna arsitektur ragam hias. ATRIUM: Jurnal Arsitektur, 7(1), 45–57. DOI: 10.21460/atrium.v7i1.146

[18] Tarigan, R., Antariksa, & Salura, P. (2022). Reconstructing the understanding of the symbolic meaning behind the architecture of Javanese traditional house. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(1), 305–322. DOI: 10.13189/cea.2022.100126

[19] Tarigan, R., Antariksa, & Salura, P. (2022). Reconstructing the understanding of the symbolic meaning behind the architecture of Javanese traditional house. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(1), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100126

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Semiotika Arsitektur sebagai Pendekatan dalam Memahami Simbol Budaya pada Bangunan Tradisional. (2026). LOSARI : Jurnal Arsitektur Kota Dan Pemukiman, 165-176. https://jurnal.ft.umi.ac.id/index.php/losari/article/view/840