Analisis Pengendalian Pendirian dan Fungsi Bangunan Pada Koridor Jalan Poros Enrekang–Toraja

Authors

  • Abdurrahman Muhti Departemen Teknik Perencanaan wilayah dan kota, Fakultas Sain Dan Teknologi, Universitas Islam Negeri alauddin Makassar Author
  • Nurfatimah Nurfatimah Departemen Teknik Perencanaan wilayah dan kota, Fakultas Sain Dan Teknologi, Universitas Islam Negeri alauddin Makassar Author
  • Nur Syam AS Departemen Teknik Perencanaan wilayah dan kota, Fakultas Sain Dan Teknologi, Universitas Islam Negeri alauddin Makassar Author

Keywords:

Building Control;, Space Utilization;, RTRW;, GSB;, Landslides.

Abstract

The rapid development of buildings along the Enrekang–Toraja Main Road Corridor has resulted in several spatial planning issues, including inconsistencies in land use, violations of Building Setback Lines (GSB), and construction in areas with steep slopes and landslide potential. This study aims to analyze the existing conditions of building construction and functions, as well as the control of spatial utilization along the Enrekang–Toraja Main Road Corridor. The study employed a descriptive approach combined with spatial analysis using a Geographic Information System (GIS). Data were collected through field observations, interviews, documentation, and the Enrekang Regency Spatial Plan (RTRW) for 2012–2032. The analysis used overlay techniques and the Norms, Standards, Procedures, and Criteria (NSPK) approach. The norms refer to the spatial pattern of Enrekang Regency for 2012–2032, the standards refer to Government Regulation No. 34 of 2006, the procedures include licensing, supervision, and monitoring, while the criteria refer to Regulation of the Minister of Public Works No. 22/PRT/M/2007. The results show that, of the 3,571 identified buildings, 1,996 are located within residential areas designated in the RTRW, while 1,575 are located in areas that are inconsistent with the spatial plan. In addition, 2,099 buildings violate the Building Setback Line, 1,223 buildings are located on moderate slopes, 44 buildings are located on steep slopes, and 30 buildings are situated in areas with potential landslide hazards. Building control has not been implemented optimally, as indicated by the presence of unlicensed buildings, irregular supervision, and weak enforcement measures

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1} Donal Catria, Melinda Noer, Y. (2024). Evaluasi Implementasi Kebijakan Tata Ruang Kawasan Perumahan Dan. 17(1), 30–41.

[2] Firmansyah, D., & Dede. (2022). Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), 1(2), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.55927/jiph.v1i2.937

[3] Fujiastuti Asyifa, B. P. (2010). EVALUASI PENYUSUNAN NORMA, STANDART DAN KRITERIA PEMANFAATAN RUANG KABUPATEN KUDUS TAHUN 2010.

[4] Kurniawan, E. (2024). Interaksi : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Sosialisasi Metode SAW ( Simple Additive Weighting ) untuk Menentukan Perangkat Desa Terbaik dalam Meningkatkan Interaksi : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. 1, 38–45.

[5] Nugroho, N. A. A., Sudarsono, B., & Sabri, L. M. (2021). Analisis Kesesuaian Penggunaan Lahan Terhadap RTRW Menggunakan Sistem Informasi Geografis. Jurnal Geodesi Undip, 10, 133–142. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/geodesi/article/viewFile/29634/24873

[6] Septiani, Y., Arribe, E., & Diansyah, R. (2020). ( Studi Kasus : Mahasiswa Universitas Abdurrab Pekanbaru ). 3(1), 131–143.

[7] Umum, D. P. (2007). Pedoman penataan ruang. 22.

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Analisis Pengendalian Pendirian dan Fungsi Bangunan Pada Koridor Jalan Poros Enrekang–Toraja. (2026). LOSARI : Jurnal Arsitektur Kota Dan Pemukiman, 79-92. https://jurnal.ft.umi.ac.id/index.php/losari/article/view/Losari1102082601